All the way through a tribulation of the traders’ claims, the famously outspoken entrepreneur sparred again and again with Baron over the process about 8 hours at the observer get up, pronouncing his questions had been “deceptive” and at one level stating him a “bad human being.”
The appeals court docket on Tuesday unfavourable arguments through the traders that SolarCity’s keep worth on June 21, 2016, used to be the one foundation of Slights’s resolution. In lieu, the top court docket dominated, the pass judgement on’s discovering that the buyout worth used to be truthful used to be sufficiently in keeping with alternative elements, together with “an array of valuation and fair price evidence” introduced through Musk, reminiscent of a equity opinion issued through Evercore and supporting analyses.
“We are convinced that the record supports the conclusion that the acquisition was entirely fair,” the appeals court docket mentioned. “The trial court’s opinion is replete with factual findings and credibility determinations, and those determinations have not been challenged and decidedly weigh in favor of Musk.”
The appellate panel did criticize Slights for no longer absolutely explaining how he got here to his conclusion, pronouncing the litigants and the court docket “would have been greatly aided by a more fulsome discussion of how the trial court weighed the valuation evidence.”
The case is In Re Tesla Motors Inc. Stockholders Litigation, 181, 2022, Delaware Best Courtroom (Dover).
